JURIS·COUNSEL In session
US Federal Litigation · Live Adversarial Arena · FRE / FRCP / SCOTUS

In the matter of Juris·Counsel Twenty-seven adversarial minds, convened — so the argument meets its hardest reader here, and not across the aisle.

Each is a complete cognitive framework, anchored in the real machinery of U.S. litigation — the Federal Rules, the canons, the precedent. Put a brief, a witness outline or a clause in front of them and it is tested rather than flattered.

10Advocates
10Bench & Strategy
07Specialist Counsel
01Live Arena

The Protocol

Exhibit 01 · Workflow 4 Movements

Turn any AI model into opposing counsel. Four steps from selecting an agent to surviving their adversarial review.

STEP / 01

Select Counsel

Choose from 27 specialists — ruthless cross-examiners, SCOTUS advocates, textualist judges, jury psychologists.

STEP / 02

Export the Prompt

Open any agent's case file and copy or download their structured system prompt — FRE & FRCP rules included.

STEP / 03

Seat the Agent

Paste into Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini or Cursor as the system instruction. Opposing counsel takes the podium.

STEP / 04

Face the Fire

Submit briefs, motions or deposition transcripts. Every weakness gets found — before the real courtroom finds it.

How To Use & Deploy

Exhibit 01B · User Guide For Lawyers, Advisors & Everyone

Zero technical experience required. Use these 27 Legal Master Agents directly inside your favorite AI app — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, or Copilot.

ChatGPT ChatGPT
Claude Claude
Gemini Google Gemini
DeepSeek DeepSeek
Perplexity Perplexity
Copilot Copilot
NotebookLM NotebookLM
Grok Grok
FOR EVERYDAY CITIZENS & BUSINESSES
Contract & Agreement Risk Audit
Upload any contract, non-compete, or lease agreement. Have the Corporate Litigator audit it for hidden liability traps, unfair penalties, or ambiguous clauses before signing.
FOR LAWYERS & PARALEGALS
Deposition & Witness Stress-Test
Paste witness statements or affidavits. Let The Ruthless Cross-Examiner spot perjury traps, internal timeline discrepancies, and prior inconsistent statements under FRE Rule 613.
FOR ADVOCATES & LAW STUDENTS
Oral Argument & Moot Court Drill
Rehearse appellate arguments before entering court. Practice answering tough questions from Strict Textualist and Living Constitution Federal Judges before the real bench rules.

Which Counsel Do I Need?

Exhibit 01C · Scenario router Situation → Master → Starter prompt

The question people actually ask is not what is this but where do I start. Find the row closest to your situation, open the case files it names, and paste the starter prompt above your own document. Nothing here is legal advice.

I was fired, demoted, or pushed out of my job
Open these case files
Act as the Employment Law Litigator. Below is a dated timeline of what happened at my job and the messages I still have. Tell me which claims are actually plausible on these facts, which facts are missing, and what my employer's strongest answer would be.
My workplace is organising, or we're at the bargaining table
Open these case files
Act as Labor & Union Counsel. Here is what management and the organising committee have each said and done. Flag anything that reads as an unfair labor practice under NLRA § 8, and tell me what the Board would look at first.
I'm signing, drafting, or fighting over a commercial contract
Open these case files
Act as the Contractual Damages Auditor. Read the agreement below clause by clause. Identify every provision that shifts risk onto me, every ambiguity a counterparty could exploit, and what my realistic exposure looks like if this goes wrong.
I sit on a board, or I run a company and worry about my duties
Open these case files
Act as Corporate Governance Counsel. Here is how our board handles oversight, minutes, and escalation of bad news. Stress-test it as a plaintiff would in a Caremark claim, and tell me what the record would fail to show.
My product or service collects personal data
Open these case files
Act as Data Privacy & Cyber Counsel. Below is what my product collects, why, where it is stored, and who it is shared with. Map each data flow to its legal basis, and tell me which collection I would struggle to defend.
Children under 13 might use what I built
Open these case files
Act as Children's Privacy & COPPA Counsel. Here is my product, its audience, and my sign-up flow. Tell me whether COPPA applies on these facts, what verifiable parental consent would require here, and where my current design fails.
I'm shipping an AI feature, or training on other people's data
Open these case files
Act as AI & Emerging Technology Counsel. Here is what my system does, what it was trained on, and what it outputs to users. Classify the risk, identify the provenance problems, and tell me what I would need on record to defend an output.
My dispute crosses a border
Open these case files
Act as Cross-Border Litigation Counsel. The parties, the evidence, and the assets are described below. Walk me through jurisdiction, how service would actually be effected, and whether any judgment I win could be enforced where the money is.
I'm dealing with a visa, a green card, or a removal notice
Open these case files
Act as Immigration & Removal Defense Counsel. Here is my status history, my filings, and every notice I have received. Build the deadline calendar first, then identify what forms of relief remain open and what evidence each one demands.
I have to testify, or sit for a deposition
Open these case files
Act as the Ruthless Cross-Examiner. Here is my statement. Cross-examine me on it: find the internal contradictions, the dates that do not line up, and the sentences I should never have volunteered.
I want my brief torn apart before a judge does
Open these case files
Act as the Strict Textualist Judge. Read the argument below as written, not as intended. Identify every step that depends on a word the text does not contain, and ask the questions you would ask from the bench.
I'm under investigation, subpoena, or regulatory enforcement
Open these case files
Act as the White-Collar Investigator. Here is the document set and the request I received. Tell me what story this paper trail tells to an investigator, what is conspicuously missing, and where my exposure concentrates.

Trial Advocates

Chamber I · Dockets 01–10 Offense & Defense Counsel

Ten heavyweights of the well of the court — cross-examination, criminal defense, corporate war, appellate strategy.

The Bench & Strategy

Chamber II · Dockets 11–20 Judges, Magistrates & War Room

Textualist and living-constitution judges, evidentiary magistrates, jury consultants and forensic strategists.

Specialist Counsel

Chamber III · Dockets 21–27 Practice-Area Chambers

Seven practice chambers for the disputes that do not begin in a courtroom — collective labor, board oversight, children's privacy, data protection, cross-border enforcement, AI accountability and immigration relief.

The File

Exhibit 02 · Anatomy of an agent What you are actually downloading

Each master is one Markdown file, and every file is built to the same skeleton — so whatever you can verify in one, you can verify in all twenty-seven. Open any case file above and the panel shows that file itself, not a summary of it.

Four parts, eleven sections

  1. Part I · Knowing the master Biography · Career timeline · Major precedents & statutory anchors · Glossary of core concepts · Why this master matters today
  2. Part II · Cognitive framework First principles · Five evaluation dimensions against which your case is stress-tested
  3. Part III · Litigation protocol Persona & tone · Method · Response structure · A worked example exchange
  4. Part IV · Language capability The register the agent answers in, and the register it refuses

The anchors in Part I are the reason the roster above prints citations on its face — three of the seven each file carries. Every framework is tied to authority a practitioner can pull and read.

Live Arena

Chamber III · Moot Court Adversarial Simulation

One case. Four minds. Watch prosecution, defense, bench and jury strategy collide in a live-typed adversarial review.

SEC v. Apex Tech Financials

DOCKET № 26-CV-0424 · § 10(b) SECURITIES FRAUD · WIRE FRAUD · REVENUE RECOGNITION

Download Agent .md